Vice President Kamala Harris’s recent foreign policy interview renews concerns about her national security. Questions arise about her readiness for presidential responsibilities. After 3 years, Americans have witnessed a lack of border security, serving as an example of Harris’s incompetence. The Biden-Harris administration is criticized for military downsizing amid rising threats in China.
Global Threat Management Oversight
Kamala Harris, tasked by President Joe Biden to examine the root causes of migration from Central America’s Northern Triangle, was criticized for not directly managing border security. Harris emphasized long-term solutions like boosting private investment in the region and encouraging over $5.2 billion in funding promises. Critics argue her involvement was marginal. Harris defended her approach by highlighting its role in reducing migration, citing corruption and instability as major issues.
However, Harris’s national security strategy came under scrutiny following an interview with Bret Baier. During the interview, she omitted pressing foreign issues like the war in Ukraine and China’s assertive stance. Analysts believe neglecting such key geopolitical threats questions her competence to engage with them effectively.
Kamala Harris is completely unhinged. When asked about her stance on Iran she went completely word salad. When asked about policy, she referred you to her website & bashed Trump.
She is not fit to be president of the United States of America. Vote accordingly! @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/UjEDbBaHMD
— j.UAP (@JDFloridaSun) October 16, 2024
The China Challenge
China’s increasingly aggressive military posture, illustrated by events like Exercise Joint Sword 2024B, where People’s Liberation Army forces encircled Taiwan, presents significant challenges. The comprehensive strategy of the Chinese Coast Guard amplifies concerns about regional power dynamics. Critics of the Biden-Harris administration assert inadequate military readiness due to the downsizing of the U.S. Navy and a lack of response to China’s actions.
The strategic challenge from China calls for adept handling to safeguard national interests, prompting some to doubt Harris’s policy acumen. Her failure to address these issues during significant foreign policy discussions raises alarms about her understanding and readiness for presidential duties.
BREAKING:
🇺🇲 The US Army is cutting its force by 24,000 due to recruiting shortfallshttps://t.co/BDF18qvsMS pic.twitter.com/ucHrgrTWjX
— Megatron (@Megatron_ron) February 27, 2024
National Security Criticisms
On the third anniversary of the U.S.’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, both Harris and Biden were notably absent. This absence contrasts the request by families of 13 servicemembers, who died in Kabul, for former President Donald Trump to lay a wreath at Arlington National Cemetery. Harris was reportedly key in deciding the U.S. evacuation from Afghanistan.
The article critiques Harris for her perceived shortcomings in strategic national security roles and covering up alleged concerns over President Biden’s cognitive health. With the handling of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and increasing Iran-backed terrorism, the efficacy of the administration’s foreign policy is questioned. Harris’s ability to take decisive action in defending U.S. interests continues to be scrutinized, leading to ongoing debate over her national security readiness.
